Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Baer, Jr., J.

Defendant, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (PMM), moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford), paid the loss incurred by Environmental Defense Fund Inc. (EDF) resulting from five years of embezzlement by two EDF officers. Hartford insured EDF against the possibility of employee dishonesty. EDF retained PMM to audit its books prior to 1979. The retention continued until April 1984. Beginning in March 1979 and continuing until 1984, EDF employed Theodore Anderman as controller…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. LybrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Bell v. GreenwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. European American Bank & Trust Co. v. Strauhs & KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Knobel v. Estate of Eugene A. Hoffman Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API