Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Bowden

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1917No. L. A. No. 3985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Differences had arisen between Ottillie K. Bowden, plaintiff herein, and Rolandus F. Bowden, defendant herein, which resulted in an action for divorce, commenced by the wife against her husband, in October, 1909. At the time they held community interests in property, real and personal. While this action was pending, on November 4, 1909, the spouses entered into an agreement whereunder the community property was divided between them. The wife agreed to dismiss the pending action for divorce and together they agreed as follows:

“The undersigned, Rolandus F. Bowden, does hereby promise to pay his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Terkelsen v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Duffy v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tyson v. TysonArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Carlsen v. CarlsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Norton v. Estate of NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Shuler v. Old Honesty Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. De Van v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API