In Re Kevin E.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
“A trial may be held although a defendant elects to present no evidence. Similarly, a trial may be held notwithstanding the refusal of the State to participate.”
Daff v. State, 317 Md. 678, 689, 566 A.2d 120, 126 (1989). In this case, we are asked to decide whether principles of double *628jeopardy apply to bar any further proceedings to adjudicate appellant, Kevin E., a juvenile, a delinquent for the offenses alleged in this case. We shall hold that on the basis of Maryland common law double jeopardy principles, appellant’s adjudication on the charges was held, as scheduled, notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Deontay J.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Mansfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- State v. PrueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Kendall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.