Legal Opinion
Valencia v. Rodriguez
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 2001No. B141937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.—In
the trial court appellants Jose C. Rodriguez and Martha O. Rodriguez 1 entered into a settlement agreement with respondents Jorge Sandoval Valencia and Maria Milan De Sandoval 2 on the record. Unknown to Sandoval and the trial court, Jose C. Rodriguez had filed a bankruptcy petition that was then pending. Shortly after the settlement, Sandoval and the trial court received notice of the bankruptcy. As a result, Sandoval made no effort to enforce the settlement agreement despite Rodriguez’s failure to comply with its terms. After dismissal of the bankruptcy petition,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- In the Matter of the Bohack Corporation, Debtor-In-Possession. The Bohack Corporation v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In Re SumpterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Tully v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Thomas v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blix Street Records, Inc. v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Higgins v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Higgins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Higgins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Rubin v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021