Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Slone Revocable Trust v. Cir

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 2015No. 12-72464, 12-72495, 12-72496, 12-72497Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNoonan, Circuit Judge

I concur in parts I-IIB of the opinion. I write separately because I conclude that the record is sufficient to reach the merits of the federal law inquiry under 26 U.S.C. § 6901. I would hold that the transaction between Slone Broadcasting and Berlinet-ta had no economic substance and that the Slone Broadcasting shareholders are transferees under 26 U.S.C. § 6901. Therefore, I would remand to the Tax Court only on the question of state law substantive liability.

The Supreme Court has stated that “[t]he general characterization of a transaction for tax purposes is a question of law subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. E. Keith Owens v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Reddam v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API