Legal Opinion

Bloomingdale v. Steubing

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1895Published

Appeal by the defendant from an order directing taxation of costs against him. The following is the opinion of the court at Special Term:

1Opinion of the CourtFitzsimons, J.

This is an action for trespass. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs were the lessees and entitled to full possession of the demised premises.

The answer denies that plaintiffs were entitled to full possession of the demised premises. The answer denies that plaintiffs were entitled to full possession of the said premises.

The plaintiffs, under the pleadings, were required to and did prove upon the trial their right of possession to said premises.

The pleadings and the proof deduced upon the trial show that plaintiffs’ right of possession to the demised premises was in question, and,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunster v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API