Rhiel v. Ohio Health Corp. (In Re Guikema)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DETERMINING: (1) APPLICABILITY OF PRECLUSION PRINCIPLES; AND (2) STANDING OF VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO OPPOSE TRUSTEE’S REQUEST FOR TURNOVER
JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction and Procedural History
Three Chapter 7 panel trustees (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed seven separate adversary proceedings (“Adversary Proceedings”) seeking turnover of the assets contained in the 403(b) plans of the debtors in the underlying estate cases. 1 One or more of the Adversary Proceedings has been assigned to each judge sitting in the Columbus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Troutman Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Donald F. Harker Iii, Trustee v. Rufus Troutman, Terry Troutman, and Lester TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Morton v. Morton (In Re Morton)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- In Re CowanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group v. Ehrenberg (In Re Moses)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re BentonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rhiel v. OhioHealth Corp. (In Re Hunter)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Appalachian Basin Capital LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022