State v. Barry
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.
The State’s evidence tended to establish the following facts:
On the afternoon of October 16, 1936, the paymaster of the May-bury Shoe Company in Rochester and his assistant went to a local bank and there procured approximately $10,000 in bills and $300 in coins, with which to settle the weekly payroll of the factory operatives. As they alighted from their automobile in front of the company’s office (one carrying a bag containing the bills', the other a bag containing the coins), they were confronted by two men, who brandished revolvers and ordered them to “drop those bags.” They obeyed this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Watson v. TwomblySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
- State v. IacavoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Dow v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Larose v. PorterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. HowlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Barger v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.