Legal Opinion

State v. Barry

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 5, 1943No. 3429PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

The State’s evidence tended to establish the following facts:

On the afternoon of October 16, 1936, the paymaster of the May-bury Shoe Company in Rochester and his assistant went to a local bank and there procured approximately $10,000 in bills and $300 in coins, with which to settle the weekly payroll of the factory operatives. As they alighted from their automobile in front of the company’s office (one carrying a bag containing the bills', the other a bag containing the coins), they were confronted by two men, who brandished revolvers and ordered them to “drop those bags.” They obeyed this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Watson v. TwomblySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  3. State v. IacavoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. Dow v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  5. Larose v. PorterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. HowlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Barger v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API