Legal Opinion

Danielczuk v. Ferioli

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 4, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The affidavits and the pleadings clearly set forth a genuine issue of material fact (Young v. Reed, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 18, 19 [1978]) as to the circumstances of the mortgagee’s representative’s failure, prior to a foreclosure sale, to keep a promised rendezvous with the alleged representative of a junior lienor who was prepared to bid an amount in excess of the sum realized at the foreclosure sale. The reasons for the meeting’s nonoccurrence are disputed and are material to the question of the good faith and reasonable diligence of the mortgagee in the conduct of the foreclosure sale. See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co. of PennsylvaniaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Bon v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. States Resources Corp. v. Architectural Team, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Palandjian v. PahlaviDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  3. Hull v. Attleboro Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Riley v. Mechanics BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Kazarian v. Shawmut Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API