Pretzel v. Anderson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. W. H. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.
There is no merit in the objection made in this cause that for various reasons the statement by the Municipal Court which is denominated in the transcript of the record a bill of exceptions should not be considered. The objections are highly technical and, under the letter and spirit of the Municipal Court Act, untenable. The decision in this court, as in the court below, must turn on the merits of the cause. The question is whether the finding and judgment of the court were sustained by the law and the evidence.
The defendant below…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Nicholson v. AldersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services of Illinois, Inc. v. JepsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Dixon v. BettenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Goetz v. OchalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Whyte v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940