Legal Opinion

Gorzel v. Orlamander

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 11, 1961No. 48620PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Commissioner.

Plaintiff and defendants owned and occupied adjoining residential lots in Normandy, Missouri. In this action plaintiff obtained a judgment by default to the effect that she had acquired an easement by prescription over the north one foot of defendants’ lot for use as a part of her driveway. It was also adjudged that defendants should remove a fence they had constructed which interfered with plaintiff’s use of said strip of ground. The court overruled defendants’ motion to set aside the default judgment and they have appealed. Since the judgment granted an easement over…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitledge v. Anderson Air Activities, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Dalton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Conant v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Parks v. CoyneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Wenzel v. WenzelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of CallahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. In Re the Marriage of BradfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Sullenger v. Cooke Sales & Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. SATURN OF TIFFANY SPRINGS v. McDARISMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Popular Leasing USA, Inc. v. Universal Art Corp. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API