Legal Opinion

Central Florida Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Cowles Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 17, 1979No. 76-1742Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

2Per curiam

The FCC and intervenors in this matter seek a rehearing, complaining inter alia that our opinion disregards the “legitimate renewal expectancies implicit in the structure of the [Communications] Act.” 1 In light of the ambiguity of the phrase “renewal expectancies” and the frequency with which they are asserted to insulate an incumbent from license challenge, we think some clarification is called for, both generally and insofar as such an expectation may have been undercut in this case.

The content of the comparative proceeding at issue was governed by the Commission’s…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. Naacp v. FpcSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Citizens Communications Center v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Hampton Roads Television Corporation and Community Broadcasting of Boston, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Wtar Radio-Tv Corporation, Rko General, Inc. (Rko) and Dudley Station Corporation, Intervenors. Citizens Communications Center v. Honorable Dean Burch, Chairman, Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API