Legal Opinion
De Jesus v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 8, 2008Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment affirmed without costs.
Appeal from order entered July 18, 2006 dismissed.
At the outset, we note that the appeal from the order entered July 18, 2006 is dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241 [1976]). However, the issues raised thereon are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiff was allegedly injured when she tripped and fell while descending a stairway in a subway station. In her notice of claim dated May 22, 2002, she…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Brown v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Levine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ingle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.