Legal Opinion

Temple v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The bill of lading, providing for the delivery of the hay to the order of ¥m. C. Bloomingdale, the shipper, at Macon, 6a., with the name of the shipper written on the back thereof, was offered in evidence by plaintiff. There was evidence that the name of the shipper, endorsed on the bill of lading, was in his handwriting. It is an order bill of lading and, therefore, negotiable by endorsement. U. S. Comp. Stat. 8604-b. Its negotiability is not affected by the provision that J. P. Temple be notified of the arrival of the hay at destination. U. S. Comp. Stat., 8604-d. Possession of the bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holloman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Anthony v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Mangum v. Mutual Grain Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Watts v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connally Realty Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Abilene Storage Co. v. Eugene Fruit Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. People v. Home Oil & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API