Legal Opinion

Faller v. Faller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1906No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by Susan Faller against Morris Faller for separate maintenance. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill asking for a divorce. From a decree for complainant, and dismissing the cross-bill, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The parties to this proceeding have been married some 20 years. They have two children, a daughter born April 16, 1886, and a son born January 25, 1888. Neither of the children are at home, and no question of their support is involved. Complainant is 10 years or more older than her husband. In her bill of complaint, in which she asks a decree for separate maintenance, the wife alleges (1) that defendant on October 15, 1903, deserted and abandoned her; (2) that defendant for 5 years last past neglected to provide suitable support for his wife *85and children; (3) that defendant has.been guilty of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearings Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  2. Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API