Legal Opinion

State v. Body

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2018No. 27732PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelbaum, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Laquita M. Body, appeals her conviction for obstructing official business following a bench trial in the Kettering Municipal Court. In support of her appeal, Body raises arguments challenging the sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence. Body also contends that her First Amendment rights were violated when police officers prohibited her from observing and filming a traffic stop involving her brother. For the reasons outlined below, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Facts and Course of Proceedings

{¶ 2} On March 20, 2017, the State filed a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. ButtramOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. FaderOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. SwaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API