Legal Opinion

Hill v. Kraft, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-649PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal.

Nothing was considered by the trial court but the complaint and the motion to dismiss. The motion was not treated as a motion for summary judgment with all parties given an opportunity to present all pertinent material in accordance with the last provision of Rule 12 (c), Ala.R.Civ.P. Therefore, this Court must test the action of the trial court under the standard of review applicable to a dismissal under Rule 12 (b)(6). Roberts v. Meeks, 397 So.2d 111 (Ala. 1981).

Motions to dismiss should be granted sparingly, and a dismissal is proper only when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Roberts v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Scott Paper Co. v. Novay Cherry Barge Service, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Humana of Alabama, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Coffee General Hospital v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Lyons v. River Road Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Dgb, LLC v. Michael HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Benjamin L. Little v. Gene Robinson.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API