Legal Opinion
Virgil L. CRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1987No. 86-5799PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Per curiam
The question presented in this social security appeal is whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services made too “mechanical” an application of the age categories in the “grid” set out at 20 C.F.R., Part 404, Subpt. P, App. 2. Because we conclude that the grid was properly applied, and because the Secretary’s findings are supported by substantial evidence, we shall affirm the denial of benefits.
The claimant, Virgil Crady, was born in October of 1929. He attended school only through the third grade. At the time of the hearing before the administrative law judge in 1984, Mr. Crady was 5'6"…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John VARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Christine HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Felix JELINEK, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Rohrich v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Higgs v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Daniels v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Van Der Maas v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Brenda BOLDEN for Gervase BOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Crawford v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.