Legal Opinion

Reginald Lett v. Paul Renico

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2009No. 07-2174UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Warden Paul Renico appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Petitioner-Appellant Reginald Lett a writ of habe-as corpus. The district court determined that the state trial court’s declaration of a mistrial and subsequent retrial violated Petitioner’s right not to be placed twice in jeopardy. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

The material facts are not in dispute. Lett was charged with first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with the shooting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API