Reginald Lett v. Paul Renico
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Warden Paul Renico appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Petitioner-Appellant Reginald Lett a writ of habe-as corpus. The district court determined that the state trial court’s declaration of a mistrial and subsequent retrial violated Petitioner’s right not to be placed twice in jeopardy. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
The material facts are not in dispute. Lett was charged with first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in connection with the shooting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010