Legal Opinion

Brettel v. Omron Scientific Techs., Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14–13936–JGDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Gail Dein, United States Magistrate Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Kristen Brettell, was injured while working on a laminating machine at the facility of her employer, Madico, Inc. ("Madico"). She brought this action against the defendants, Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. and Omron STI Machine Services, Inc. (collectively "Omron"), alleging that Omron had been negligent in its inspection, testing and/or servicing of the laminating machine. Omron brought a Third-Party Complaint against Madico for *471contractual indemnification (Count I) and breach of contract (Count II). This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API