Legal Opinion

Bethune v. Woodbury Police Department

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2022No. 0:21-cv-02035Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jason Lavet Bethune, Case No. 21-cv-2035 (WMW/DTS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Woodbury Police Department, Regions Hospital, 911 Washington County Sheriff, and Post Board, Defendants. Before the Court are Plaintiff Jason Lavet Bethune’s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).1 (Dkts. 1, 2). A district court may dismiss any action or part of an action filed by a litigant seeking IFP status that is frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see also Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 307–08…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hervey v. County of KoochichingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Carlson v. Roetzel & AndressCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API