Legal Opinion

Pacific States Securities Corp. v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1928No. 20935. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On January 10,1925, defendant Austin was the owner of a truck and trailer, which he on that day mortgaged to one Raynor for a certain sum of money, and subsequently Raynor assigned the note and chattel mortgage to appellant. This chattel mortgage was a renewal, or substitution, of' another chattel mortgage on the same property for a larger sum of money, which in turn was also a renewal, or substitution, for still another chattel mortgage for a still larger sum of money upon the'same truck and trailer. In addition to the amounts due on the chattel mortgage, appellant had paid out certain sums…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hicks v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Olsen v. Legal Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sutter v. Moore Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Osburn v. DolanWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  2. Oliver v. Electrical Products ConsolidatedWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Union High School District No. 400 v. Pacific Northwest Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sullivan v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API