Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2011No. 2010-KM-00698-SCTPublished

1DissentKitchens, Justice

¶ 25. The only reason cited by the State as grounds for reinstating Nelson’s appeal and nolle prossing the misdemeanor charge was to allow the State an opportunity to indict Nelson for a felony charge. The United States Supreme Court has clearly held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the State’s pursuing a felony indictment following a defendant’s appeal of a misdemeanor charge for the same conduct. Thigpen v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27, 104 S.Ct. 2916, 82 L.Ed.2d 23 (1984); Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 40 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. Anthony Antone, Manuel Gispert, Larry Neil Miller, Frank Diecidue, A/K/A "The Under Boss," Frank Boni, Jr., and Homer Rex DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API