Nelson v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentKitchens, Justice
¶ 25. The only reason cited by the State as grounds for reinstating Nelson’s appeal and nolle prossing the misdemeanor charge was to allow the State an opportunity to indict Nelson for a felony charge. The United States Supreme Court has clearly held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the State’s pursuing a felony indictment following a defendant’s appeal of a misdemeanor charge for the same conduct. Thigpen v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27, 104 S.Ct. 2916, 82 L.Ed.2d 23 (1984); Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 40 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Anthony Antone, Manuel Gispert, Larry Neil Miller, Frank Diecidue, A/K/A "The Under Boss," Frank Boni, Jr., and Homer Rex DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.