Legal Opinion

Channel One Systems, Inc. v. Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1986No. Civ. 86-150(AHN)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

NEVAS, District Judge.

This action for declaratory and injunctive relief seeks an interpretation and application of the recently-enacted Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the “Cable Act”). Plaintiff-Channel One Systems, Inc. (“Channel One”) requests declaratory relief by this court that a state agency authorized by the Cable Act and by state statute to regulate operators of cable systems is, in this case, prohibited from regulating a Channel One facility which provides cable service in Southbury, Connecticut. Channel One also seeks to permanently enjoin the state…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dept. of Public Utility ControlDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  2. Guidry Cablevision/simul Vision Cable System v. City of BallwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. In re Alleged Non-Compliance by RCN of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. City of Mason City v. City Center of Mason City, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Guidry Cablevision v. City of BallwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API