Legal Opinion
United States v. Castillo
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
Decided April 15, 1992No. NMCM No. 91 2023PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLISON, Judge:
Consistent with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of one specification of willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer in violation of Article 90, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 890. A military judge sitting as a special court-martial sentenced the appellant to confinement for five months, forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for a period of five months, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged, but suspended all unexecuted confinement and forfeitures in excess of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Honorable Parren J. Mitchell v. Melvin R. LairdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. AyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ShellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. LowryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Private E2 URIEL RIVASCHIVASArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- Authorization for Continuing Hostilities in Kosovo, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2000
- United States v. HutflessNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018