Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank, NA v. Hasty
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided August 17, 2007No. 2006-CA-000758-MR, 2006-CA-000740-MRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUCKINGHAM, Senior Judge.
U.S. Bank, NA (the bank), appeals from an order of the McCracken Circuit Court that had the effect of denying the bank’s Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure (CR) 60.02 motion to set aside the final judgment in its foreclosure action against Michael Scott Hasty and Cynthia Hasty and amend its complaint to name Heights Finance Corporation as a party to the proceedings. The bank sought to reopen the foreclosure proceedings because Heights Finance had filed a judgment lien against the subject property subsequent to the filing of the bank’s foreclosure action, but…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palmer v. Washington Mutual Bank (In Re Ritchie)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Young v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
- Gustafson v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM v. Barnett, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- In re: Benjamin Ritchie v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.