Scott v. Wasielewski
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
The petitioner, twice previously, has been in this court in connection with his claims for compensation based on the injury involved in the instant petition. The injury (to petitioner’s neck) occurred November 5, 1953. Responding to his claim that he could not do work which required him to look up or use his arms above his head, or to hold weighty objects or do heavy work without suffering and a need to lie down to rest, the Commission made an award which this court set aside because erroneously entered under the scheduled A.R.S. § 23-1044, subd. B, rather than the unscheduled…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Hopper v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Southwest Nurseries v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Tamburello v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.