Tinsley v. Talbott
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns a trial court’s right on its own initiative to order a remittitur, and the procedure to be followed therein.
The jury returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Mr. Tinsley, for $9,000. Ex mero motu, the trial court immediately found that the verdict was excessive and was not supported by the weight of the evidence. The court then ordered that the amount of the verdict be remitted to $2,000. That judgment was amended on the following day so as to provide a judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,565.95.
Rule 59(d),…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- McCormick v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goolesby v. WilksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002