Mary Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
The outcome of this appeal turns on our interpretation of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro 1 — specifically whether that decision renders our stream-of-commerce approach to personal jurisdiction improper. Finding that application of the stream-of-commerce approach in this case does not run afoul of McIntyre’s narrow holding, we affirm the district court’s interlocutory order finding personal jurisdiction and denying dismissal.
I
On September 29, 2010, Mary P. Ains-worth (“Ms. Ainsworth”), individually and on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Plixer International, Inc. v. Scrutinizer GMBHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Taishan Gypsum Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- MetalForming, Inc. v. Schechtl Maschinenbau GmbhCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.