Legal Opinion

Mary Ainsworth v. Cargotec USA, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 9, 2013No. 12-60155PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

The outcome of this appeal turns on our interpretation of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro 1 — specifically whether that decision renders our stream-of-commerce approach to personal jurisdiction improper. Finding that application of the stream-of-commerce approach in this case does not run afoul of McIntyre’s narrow holding, we affirm the district court’s interlocutory order finding personal jurisdiction and denying dismissal.

I

On September 29, 2010, Mary P. Ains-worth (“Ms. Ainsworth”), individually and on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Plixer International, Inc. v. Scrutinizer GMBHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  4. Taishan Gypsum Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. MetalForming, Inc. v. Schechtl Maschinenbau GmbhCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API