Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Deitz

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

There are two questions involved in this appeal: (1) Whether or not a materialman may enforce his lien as created under the chapter creating li.ens, Sections 64-1101, 64-1142, T.C.A. by attachment and subsequent sale of the property of the home owner where the home owner has made no contract with the purported- materialman and the contractor is not before the court on personal service, and (2) whether or not the Chancery Court abused its discretion in dismissing the attachment of the *79property of the home owner, leaving the suit for a money judgment pending against the contractors when said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Taylor v. Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Warner v. YatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Conger Lumber & Supply Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Brantingham v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Eatherly Construction Co. v. DeBoer Construction, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cooper v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. Christmas Lumber Co. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Eatherly Construction Co. v. DeBoer Construction, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API