Jordan v. Deitz
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
There are two questions involved in this appeal: (1) Whether or not a materialman may enforce his lien as created under the chapter creating li.ens, Sections 64-1101, 64-1142, T.C.A. by attachment and subsequent sale of the property of the home owner where the home owner has made no contract with the purported- materialman and the contractor is not before the court on personal service, and (2) whether or not the Chancery Court abused its discretion in dismissing the attachment of the *79property of the home owner, leaving the suit for a money judgment pending against the contractors when said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chumbley v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- Taylor v. Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Warner v. YatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Conger Lumber & Supply Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Brantingham v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Eatherly Construction Co. v. DeBoer Construction, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooper v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Christmas Lumber Co. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Eatherly Construction Co. v. DeBoer Construction, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976