Hobson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLaramoee, Judge
This case involves a claim for a Civil Service retirement annuity by a retired Army officer. His claim is based on this court’s decision in Prentiss v. United States, 123 Ct. Cl. 225, and Bond v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 204, cert. denied 351 U.S. 974.
The facts are these: Plaintiff served as a commissioned officer of the Army for 25 years and 8 months. Pursuant to Rev. Stat. 1251, he was retired for disability, in the rank of Colonel, effective October 31,1944. Under this retirement he was entitled to and received 75 percent of the basic active-duty pay of an officer of his rank and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Croghan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Feldman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Prentiss v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Bond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Joseph D. JeffreyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Joseph D. JeffreyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987