Legal Opinion

Hofstee v. Dow

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 2001No. 20046-9-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

In this third appeal of a lawsuit that has yet to come to trial, Hans Hofstee challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his claims for negligence and strict liability. The trial court found that Mr. Hofstee’s damages, allegedly caused by Alvin Dow’s failure to timely test his cows for brucellosis before they were sold to Mr. Hofstee, were solely economic. Consequently, the trial court concluded Mr. Hofstee was limited to recovery under the Uniform Commercial Code and the Consumer Protection Act. Mr. Hofstee contends his damages involve more than economic loss. We disagree, and affirm.

Facts

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Easter v. American West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Fortune View Condo. Ass'n v. Fortune Star Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hofstee v. DowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Easter v. American West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Cashatt v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API