New England Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
New England Power Company (“NEP”) seeks review of orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”).1 In the orders, FERC found the 18 percent per year late payment charge that NEP had applied to the Town of Norwood’s overdue contract termination payments to be unjust and unrea*57sonable. FERC ordered that NEP substitute a prime rate-based interest rate as set forth in 18 C.F.R. § 35.19a (the “Revised Interest Rate”). NEP does not appeal this ruling. Instead, NEP challenges only FERC’s determination that the lower Revised Interest Rate must be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amy Cohen v. Brown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- K N Energy, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Western Gas Resources, Inc., Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Town of Norwood v. New England Power Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New England Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008