Beaucar v. Bristol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
These two causes of action were brought on separate complaints presenting the same issues of law and alleging some basically identical facts. They were tried together by agreement of the parties and order of the court. From a judgment for the defendant in each ease the plaintiff has appealed. The appeals have been combined, and therefore only one opinion of this court will suffice for the disposition of both cases. Practice Book § 606; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 124.
Upon adequate and sufficient evidence, the court found the following facts, which are not subject to any corrections which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- State v. CoulombeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Benjamin v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Benjamin v. NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Connecticut Fair Housing Ctr v. CoreLogic Rental Property Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Dennis W. Blackmon v. LP Pigeon Forge, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011