Legal Opinion

In re Raskin

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided September 15, 1987No. Bankruptcy No. 86-02346-BKC-TCBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO REOPEN CASE AND TO AVOID LIEN

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Chief Judge.

The debtors’ motions under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b) to reopen their case in order to avoid a judicial lien under § 522(f)(1) were heard on September 4.

This case was closed on March 27, 1987 and the motion to reopen was filed five months later. Lien avoidance may be sought by motion. B.R. 4003(d). No deadline is fixed either by statute or by rule for the filing of the motion. A closed case:

*344“may be reopened in the court in which such case was closed to administer assets, to accord relief to the debtor, or for other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Volpitta v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BeardenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API