Ostic v. Stephens
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■'-COMPTON, Justice.
The -case involves an election contest. The principal question is whether Chapter 59,' Law's’ 'of 1933, ’ section 14— Í305, 1941 Comp, 'providing for ■ election contests for the various municipal officers, including aldermen and trustees, includes contest for officers of municipalities operating under the commission form of government pursuant .to., the; provisions of Chapter 21, Laws of .1921',':, and.. ftet-s amendatory thereto. 1941- Comp. § 14-1101 et seq. If not, the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain the contest.
The City of Tucumcari had previously…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crist v. AbbottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Wood v. BealsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Montoya v. GuruleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Denton v. VinyardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Rogers v. ScottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Perez v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Gonzales v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Romenesko v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968