Legal Opinion

Flint v. Voiles

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1936No. 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

In this cause it is desired to have this court review by proceedings in error an order of the district court of Sheridan County, granting a new trial upon motion of Sarah Voiles, as administratrix of the estate of William A. Voiles, deceased. The trial thus ordered has not been had and no judgment disposing of the issues thus for trial has been entered in that court.

The litigation arose in consequence of an automobile accident in which William A. Voiles, the husband of Sarah Voiles, lost his life. She, as administratrix of his estate, brought the action against John C. Flint,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Feeter v. . ArkenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Kahn v. Traders InsuranceWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Lee v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Mitchell v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rutledge v. VonfeldtWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bales v. BromeWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kansas-Wyoming Oil Corp. v. GreaserWyoming Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API