Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Maher

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 20, 1978No. Civ. N-76-12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DALY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are recipients of public assistance under the joint federal and state program of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). 1 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. They have moved for summary judgment claiming that the procedures followed by the Connecticut Department of Social Services in replacing lost, stolen, or misplaced AFDC checks violate the “reasonable promptness” standard of 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(10), and are therefore invalid under the Supremacy Clause. 2 In response, the defendant also requests summary judgment.

AFDC PROCEDURES

Payments under…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mandel v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coalition for Basic Human Needs v. Edward J. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  2. Beasley v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
  3. Kessler v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Pratt v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991
  5. Bacon v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API