Legal Opinion

Beck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

485 So.2d 1203 (1984)

Gilbert Franklin BECK, alias

v.

STATE.

7 Div. 909.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 20, 1984.

Rehearing Denied April 24, 1984.

ON REMAND

TYSON, Judge.

The Supreme Court of Alabama in Beck v. State, 485 So.2d 1201 (Ala.1984), held that a Witherspoon[1] error, committed during the selection of the jury prior to the guilt stage trial, does not necessitate a new guilt stage trial. "Only a new sentence proceeding is required on remand to the trial court." Beck v. State, supra. The court concluded that under Alabama's capital punishment scheme "remand for a new sentencing…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Beck v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Starks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ex Parte BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Scarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API