Legal Opinion

Welch v. Welch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1915No. 7461Published

Error from District Court, Ottawa County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by Maude Welch, a • minor, by her guardian, John A. Daniels, against Helen Welch, defendant. From the judgment, Helen Welch brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This cause comes’ ón to be heard upon a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant in error, upon the ground, among others, that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of said cause, for the reason-that there was no service of summons in error upon the defendant in error, Maud Welch, who, at the time this proceeding in error was instituted, was a minor over the age of 14 years, as provided by section 4721, Rev. Laws Okla. 1910," nor upon her attorney of record, as provided by section 5238, Rev. Laws Okla. 1910, within the statutory time allowed for taking an appeal, nor did she appear in said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruner v. NordmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. First State Bank of Davidson v. ClinganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API