Legal Opinion
Arcese v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 16, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Epes, J.j
delivered the opinion of the court.
Andrino Arcese, a resident of the city of Portsmouth, Virginia, is a World War veteran, who was totally disabled *118while in the service of the United States. Joe Arcese, also a resident of Portsmouth, is his committee, having been appointed by the Hustings Court of that city.
As such committee, Joe Arcese received from the United States a number of payments of money for the benefit of Andrino Arcese. Some of these payments were for compensation allowed Andrino Arcese under the provisions of Part II of the World War Veterans’ Act of 1924. (Act Cong.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Plummer v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Miller & Rhoads Bldg., L.L.C. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Commonwealth v. Community Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Cole v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Department of Public Welfare Ex Rel. Central State Hospital v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934