Legal Opinion

City of Hoopeston v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. Lawrence T. Allen, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

The city council of the city of Hoopeston passed an ordinance providing for the improvement of Maple street from the east curb line of Second avenue to the west line of Fifth street, by grading, curbing, graveling, draining and paving with brick. The ordinance provides that the whole cost of grading, curbing, graveling and paving with brick, estimated at $10,562, including expenses and court costs, should be paid by special taxation to be levied upon the property contiguous to and abutting the improvement, in proportion to the frontage of each lot. The ordinance specifically and in detail…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quick v. Village of River ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Mattoon v. StumpIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. SedgwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API