Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Abellera

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 2000No. A00A0918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

Elaine Williamson and her mother, Lucille Morris, sued attorney Ronald Abellera and his employer, the law firm of Blackburn, Walther & Sloan, LLC, for legal malpractice. The trial court granted Abellera and the law firm summary judgment on the ground that there was an unforeseeable intervening act between their actions and the injury. Because the record contains evidence that the intervening act could reasonably have been foreseen, summary judgment was not appropriate, and therefore, we reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Coleman v. Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Devins v. LEAFMORE FOREST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF OWNERSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Schernekau v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Tucker Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BaloghCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abellera v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Griffin v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Riggins v. City of St. MarysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API