Legal Opinion

Estate of Miller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The law affecting taxation of intangibles involved in transfers intended to become effective as to “possession or enjoyment” at or after the death of the donor must be considered settled as giving power to the state to impose such tax where the legal interests created are within the control of the state. In Curry v. McCanless (1939), 307 U. S. 357, 372, 59 Sup. Ct. 900, 83 L. Ed. 1339, 123 A. L. R. 162, Mr. Justice Stone in treating with facts somewhat analogous to those in the present case said: “In effecting her purposes, the testatrix brought some of the legal interests which she created…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Barhorst v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Bulkley v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Estate of MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. State v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API