Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Hough

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1843PublishedCited by 18 opinions

This case was brought up, by writ-of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the- District of Columbia, holden in and for the county of Alexandria.. The facts'in the case, and bills of exceptions,-are stated in the opinion of the courts to which,the reader is referred.' raised the following points.

Read the full summary

This case was brought up, by writ-of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the- District of Columbia, holden in and for the county of Alexandria.. The facts'in the case, and bills of exceptions,-are stated in the opinion of the courts to which,the reader is referred.' raised the following points. First bill of. exceptions. — There was error in the opinion and instructions of the court. 1. Because' tne instruction was not given upon the whole of the .evidence of the witness, Isaac Robbins, but upon only part, which he gave upon cross-examination by the defendant in error. 2.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daniel

This cause is brought before this court upon a writ-of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Columbia. The questions for consideration here, arise upon the following statement! The pláintiff in error instituted in the Circuit Court for the -District of Columbia, an action of. assumpsit against the .defendant for. the use and occupation- of a bouse in the town of Alexandria. The declaration contains two counts;-the first declaring upon án express agreement between the parties for the occupation and rent, and the second counting upon-an occupation by the defendant…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Bigby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Whitehurst v. . DaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WinslowIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cannon Ball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API