Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Patillo

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1949No. 6 Div. 827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

W. E. Patillo filed suit for the use and benefit of Mrs. Lois Morgan, the wife of Herbert Morgan. The defendant in the case is Sid Barnett.

The cause of action is brought under the protective provision of Title 9, Sec. 45, Code 1940.

In the court below there was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The assignments of error are predicated solely upon the rulings of the trial court incident to the introduction of evidence.

Herbert Morgan testified that he lost a considerable amount of money to the defendant in a dice game. All that transpired between the participating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. AdamsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Wigginton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Gramling v. DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. PatilloSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API