Anderson v. Baughman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before J. E. McDonald, special J., Barnwell, August, 1903. Creditor’s bill by P. M. Anderson, administrator of N. D. Anderson, against P. M. A. Baughman et al. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cite: As to payments: 28 S. C., 285. cites: As to presumption of payment: 25 S. C., 214; 32 S. C., 140; 45 S. C., 337. As to homestead exemption: 21 S. C., 375; 37 S. C., 376; 41 S. C., 109 ; 45 S. C., 65; 47 S. C., 446.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
This action was instituted by sup-
plemental proceedings to subject lands in the possession of the widow and children of Andrew J. Baughman, deceased, which had been assigned to him as a homestead, to the payment of a judgment against him, upon the ground that said homestead had been abandoned as such by the widow and children of the deceased judgment debtor, and was, therefore, no longer exempt from sale under the judgment.
The Circuit Court, special Judge J. E. McDonald, presiding, overruled the defenses interposed, statute of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adams v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Gibson v. LowndesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. EllisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Voyles v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907