Legal Opinion

H. T. Cottam & Co. v. Comision Reguladora del Mercado de Henequen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 31, 1921No. 24766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans p Ered D. King, Judge. Suit by H. T. Cottam & Co., Inc., against Comisión Reguladora del Mercado de Henequen, in which the Republic of Mexico intervened and claimed' the property attached. Judgment for'the plaintiff, sustaining the attachment and dismissing the petition of intervention, and the intervener appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The original plaintiff in this suit, H. T. Cottam & Co., Inc., is_a Louisiana corporation, domiciled in New Orleans. The defendant, Comisión rieguiadora, is a.Maxican corporation,' domiciled in the state of Yucatan. The suit is to recover a large sum of money -represented by written- evidences of debt. The defendant being domiciled outside of the state of Louisiana, a writ of attachment was obtained, by virtue of which the sheriff seized, as the property of the defendant, the steamship Oaxáca, in port at New Orleans. 1

The Republic of Mexico filed a petition of intervention in' the suit,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Dussuau v. RilieuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1821
  4. President of the Portland Bank v. StaceyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  5. United States v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Usatorre v. the VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Moscow Fire Insurance Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API