Legal Opinion

Hoskinson v. Adkins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, Putnam, Circuit Court. — Hon. Andrew Ellison, Judge. The judgment of foreclosure established the validity of the mortgage sued on, and to that extent was binding upon the defendants. Butterfield's Appeal, 78 Pa. St. 197; Lee v. Kingsbury, 13 Texas 70 ; Clark v. Boyreau, 14 Cal. 634.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This is an action of ejectment instituted in the circuit court of Putnam county, to recover possession of the west half of southeast quarter and the east half of southwest quarter of section 34, township 65, range 19.

Win. Adkins filed an answer denying all the allegations of the petition, except that of his possession of the land, and Kendall filed a separate answer, containing a general denial and a special defense consisting of the following facts: That Sarah and Yan Manchester, under whom both parties claim title, on the 6th day of May, 1867, executed a mortgage by which they conveyed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fithian v. MonksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Bartlett v. O'DonoghueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Higgins v. PeltzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Smith's Administrator v. RollinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  5. Wernecke v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hagerman v. SuttonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Ozark County v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Holton v. TownerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Corrigan & Waters v. BradyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Genoway v. MaizeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API