Legal Opinion
Transit Authority of River City v. Bibelhauser
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided September 27, 2013No. 2011-CA-002039-MRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANMETER, Judge:
Transit Authority of River City (“TARC”) and Dalton Holt appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court order denying TARC’s motion for partial summary judgment. The issue before us is whether TARC enjoys immunity from the underlying negligence action filed by Adam Bibel-hauser to recover injuries he sustained after being struck by a TARC bus that was operated by Holt.1 For the following reasons, we agree with the trial court that TARC is not immune from suit and affirm its order denying TARC’s motion for summary judgment.
On September 8, 2008, Holt, while operating a TARC bus,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
- Yanero v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Lewis v. B & R CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Hallahan v. the Courier JournalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cindy Shadrick v. Hopkins Cnty., KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Bryant v. Louisville Metro Hous. Auth.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- New Albany Main Street Props. v. Watco Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Harris v. GoinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.